Legal Opinion · Dissent

Williams v. Glash

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1990No. C-8786Published

1DissentSpears, Justice

What the court has really decided today is that an injured tort victim should not be held to his bargain if the bargain later appears unfair. In order to reach this result, the court relies on the doctrine of mutual mistake and a long string citation. Yet, the reality is that the cases from other jurisdictions present a jumbled mish-mash of reasonings and results. The “mutual mistake” rationale does not adequately explain their holdings. See Casey v. Proctor, 59 Cal.2d 97, 28 Cal.Rptr. 307, 378 P.2d 579, 587 (1963). Therefore, rather than trying to resolve this case by simple string citation,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Aranda v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Casey v. ProctorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Sanger v. Yellow Cab Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  4. Boles v. BlackstockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. McCartyTexas Supreme Court · 1901

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API