Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bowen v. Brock

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 11, 1952No. 35295Published

1DissentGibson, J.

I think the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.

It is apparent from the allegations of the petition that the action is one to try title to the offices of members of the plaintiff school board.

In paragraph numbered six of the petition it is alleged:

“The Defendants, Irvin Brock, George Wilhelm and Vernon Harding have sought, and now are seeking to usurp, intrude into and unlawfully to exercise the powers and authority of the Board of Education of the said school district. They have heretofore forcibly taken possession of the high school building and offices of the district wherein…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hollarn v. AldenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API