Legal Opinion

In re Pomerantz

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 25, 1909No. 2,895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Bankruptcy. On certificate of referee recommending refusal of discharge. The following is the report of Edward E. Hoffman, referee, on objections to the discharge of the bankrupts: To the Honorable the Judges of the District Court: I respectfully report that the specifications of objections to the bankrupts’' discharge are brought under clauses 2 and 3, § 14, par. 3, of the bankruptcy act of July 1,1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 550 (TJ. S. Comp.

Read the full summary

In Bankruptcy. On certificate of referee recommending refusal of discharge. The following is the report of Edward E. Hoffman, referee, on objections to the discharge of the bankrupts: To the Honorable the Judges of the District Court: I respectfully report that the specifications of objections to the bankrupts’' discharge are brought under clauses 2 and 3, § 14, par. 3, of the bankruptcy act of July 1,1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 550 (TJ. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3427), as amended by Act Feb. 5, 1903, c. 487, § 4, 32 Stat. 797 (ü. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p. 1026), which provides for a discharge…

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

It is not necessary to consider the question whether a materially false statement made by a debtor to a mercantile agency should be regarded as made to his creditors in general or to a specified creditor in particular, so as to fall within the class of false statements described in section 14b (3) of the bankruptcy act of July 1,1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 550 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3427), as amended by Act Feb. 5, 1903, c. 487, § 4, 32 Stat. 797 (U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p. 1026), since in my opinion, the discharge was properly refused upon the other ground…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re KoelleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API