In re Oestreicher

CRICHTON, J.,

additionally concurs and assigns reasons:

hi agree with the decision to deny the Office of Disciplinary Counsel’s request to reject the disciplinary board recommendation.

The facts in this case evidence a number of significant mitigating factors, including respondent’s good character and reputation, that respondent acted promptly to rectify the violations, and lack of actual harm. Additionally, the disciplinary board found no aggravating factors at all, and noted that respondent made full disclosures to the disciplinary board and cooperated in the proceedings.

While this Court is…