Delafield v. Village of Westfield
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by Clarence Delafleld against the village of Westfield. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $2,515.70, entered in Chautauqua county on the report of a referee, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
In the year 1889 the village of Westfield caused to be prepared plans and specifications for waterworks for the village. Bids were invited from contractors. The plaintiff, who was a contractor and engineer, submitted a bid or proposal sheet for the work, which was accepted by the defendant, and a written contract, based upon the plans and specifications and proposal sheet, was entered into between the parties on the 19th day of July, 1889. The scheme contemplated taking the water from a stream several miles from the village, at a point called the “Intake.” From this point the water was to be…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Delafield v. Village of WestfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Atlantic Dredging Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1900
- Rhodes v. CluteUtah Supreme Court · 1898
- Smith v. Salt Lake CityU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Utah · 1897
- Groton Bridge & Manufacturing Co. v. Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.