Legal Opinion

Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 12, 1929No. 9327PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

This appeal proceeds from a temporary injunction, issued on the application of the state by the district court of Wharton county, presumably pursuant to articles 4444, 7467, 7577, 5351, 7572, 4026, R. C. S. of 1925, and articles 697, 698, Penal Code, effective until its further order, and enjoining appellant, its agent and representatives, “in all things as prayed for in plaintiffs petition, and especially from permitting the waters emanating and escaping from the McCarson well No. 3 and the Banker No. 12, from flowing to or in the San Bernard River. As to all defendants other than said Texas…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. Gold Run Ditch & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1884
  2. McDaniel v. City of CherryvaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. City of Valparaiso v. MoffittIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. KezerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Day v. Louisville Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. City of Weslaco v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Harris County v. International Paper Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
  4. Long v. AnthonyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API