Diaz v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUTTS, Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction for murder. TEX.PENAL.CODE ANN. § 19.-02(a)(1) (Vernon 1974). A jury assessed punishment at 40 years’ imprisonment.
Appellant brings 18 points of error, the first two regarding TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 37.07 (Vernon 1981 and Supp.1986). In his first point appellant says that amendments to article 37.07 permitting instruction on parole laws to juries violate the ex post facto provision of the constitution. U.S. CONST, art. I, § 9; TEX. CONST, art. I, § 16. We are not told by what means there is a violation, however. The fact that a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hodge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Mendoza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Braudrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Dempsey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- Givens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Barber v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Diaz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Ceasar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.