Legal Opinion

Van Kleeck v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1966No. Claim 39285PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order appealed from should be modified (see Cornell v. T. V. Development Corp., 17 N Y 2d 69, 73). Since the property was valued on a commercial basis, no value should have been assigned to the buildings on the property, which were inconsistent with that use (Matter of Erlanger, 237 N. Y. 159, 164; Spano v. State of New York, 22 A D 2d 757). Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division is modified to the extent of striking therefrom so much as awards $15,000 for the buildings and, as modified, the order is affirmed, with costs.

Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Yan…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of ErlangerNew York Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re West Bushwick Urban Renewal AreaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. In re City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In re Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. In re Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. In re West Bushwick Urban Renewal Area, Phase 2Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API