Van Kleeck v. State
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order appealed from should be modified (see Cornell v. T. V. Development Corp., 17 N Y 2d 69, 73). Since the property was valued on a commercial basis, no value should have been assigned to the buildings on the property, which were inconsistent with that use (Matter of Erlanger, 237 N. Y. 159, 164; Spano v. State of New York, 22 A D 2d 757). Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division is modified to the extent of striking therefrom so much as awards $15,000 for the buildings and, as modified, the order is affirmed, with costs.
Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Yan…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of ErlangerNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re West Bushwick Urban Renewal AreaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2008
- In re Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- In re Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re West Bushwick Urban Renewal Area, Phase 2Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.