Osuna v. Southern Pacific Railroad
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Justice.
This is a railroad crossing accident case brought by plaintiff-appellant Mrs. Eva Osuna against Southern Pacific Transportation Company (sued as Southern Pacific Railroad). Summary judgment was rendered that plaintiff take nothing. Plaintiff appealed. We affirm the judgment.
To establish its right to summary judgment, defendant had the burden of establishing that no material fact issue existed in the case and that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Rule 166— A(c), Vernon’s Tex.Rules Civ.Proc.; Town North Nat. Bank v. Broaddus, 569 S.W.2d 489, 494 (Tex.1978). In…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Farley v. Prudential Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Town North National Bank v. BroaddusTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Fort Worth & Denver Railway Company v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Texas & N. O. R. v. StrattonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Osuna v. Southern Pacific RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Arthur Walker v. Kansas City Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982