Maziroff v. Commercial Bank

The plaintiff sued the defendant for an alleged wrongful attachment of her property and for wrongfully issuing a writ of garnishment, by which, owing to the peculiar form of the writ, money on deposit in her name *391was tied up, although the principal action was against Jacob Maziroff. The evidence on the trial as to the title of plaintiff was mainly that of Jacob Maziroff, who testified that he transferred the property which he had employed in his business as junk dealer to his wife, the plaintiff, by a bill of sale reciting a consideration of $1 and other valuable considerations; that at the…