Legal Opinion

Consolidated Pipe & Supply Co. v. City of Bessemer

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 30, 2010No. 2090095 and 2090096PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

Consolidated Pipe & Supply Company (“Consolidated”) appeals from a judgment of the Jefferson Circuit Court, Bessemer Division, determining that its claims against the City of Bessemer (“the City”), T.E. Stevens Company, Inc. (“the contractor”), and Christopher Development and Construction, LLC (“the subcontractor”), were barred by the operation of state competitive-bid laws. We affirm as to the claims against the City, but we reverse as to the claims against the contractor and the subcontractor.

The record in this case reveals that the contractor and Visionland Outlet Center,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. League v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  2. Sims v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Ex Parte First Alabama BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Ex Parte BallewSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Denson v. Alabama Fuel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walker v. WalkerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  2. Holland v. SweeneySupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  3. M.H. v. B.F., 2100116 (ala.civ.app. 6-10-2011)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API