Legal Opinion

State v. Espinoza-Soriano

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 2020No. E-18-067PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Espinoza-Soriano,

2020-Ohio-139.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. E-18-067 Appellee Trial Court No. CRB 1800489 v. Jamie Espinoza-Soriano DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant Decided: January 17, 2020 ***** Kevin J. Baxter, Erie County Prosecuting Attorney, and Anthony A. Battista III, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Emil G. Gravelle III, for appellant. ***** OSOWIK, J. Facts and Procedural History {¶ 1} On August 31, 2018, Trooper Brian Dale of the Ohio State Highway Patrol was conducting “air…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Currie v. LaoIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DeanOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. State v. Espinoza-SorianoOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API