Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Kemp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 26, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 20, 2004, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant lost his job as a direct care counselor due to disqualifying misconduct. The record establishes that while on a 10-day suspension for letting an unauthorized driver operate the company vehicle, claimant called his supervisor to discuss a temporary change…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of PaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of WalliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of HorsfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. In re the Claim of PorterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API