Legal Opinion

HST Corporate Interiors, LLC v. Sherrick (In re Sherrick)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided July 6, 2017No. CASE NO. 316-00182; ADV. NO. 316-90109PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Marian F. Harrison, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

HST Corporate Interiors, LLC (“HST”) filed the above-styled adversary complaint to determine whether its claim against Paul W. Sherrick (“debtor”) is nondis-chargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A), (a)(4), (a)(6), and (a)(14). For the following reasons, which represent the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a)(1), as incorporated by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7052, the Court finds that HST’s claim is nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4).

I. FACTS

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Gleason v. ThawSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. RitzSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. In Re Benethel Rembert, Debtor. Benethel Rembert v. At & T Universal Card Services, Inc. Citibank South Dakota, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lansden v. Jones (In re Jones)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2018
  2. Creditors v. LileDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API