Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Bishop

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDodd, J.

This is a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to the provisions of section 476 of the Civil Practice Act and rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The suit is brought for the partition of certain real property situated in the counties of Kings and New York. All of the plaintiffs and defendants have or claim an interest in the real estate of John Thomas Smith, sometimes known as Edward Smith, who died intestate in the borough of Manhattan in May, 1938. The intestate’s mother and her four brothers and four sisters had predeceased him. He was unmarried and his only surviving…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of WendelNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of MeyerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953
  2. Bishop v. BishopAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. In re the Estate of DeflacieuzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1976
  4. In re the Final Accounting of ConnellyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API