In Re Howard
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
912 S.W.2d 61 (1995)
In re Raymond HOWARD, Respondent.
No. 77446.
Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.
December 19, 1995.
John E. Howe, Chief Disciplinary Counsel, Barry J. Klinckhardt, Asst. Disciplinary Counsel, Jefferson City, for informant.
Raymond Howard, pro se.
ORIGINAL DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING
BENTON, Judge.
The Chief Disciplinary Counsel charges attorney Raymond Howard with "placing his own prurient interests paramount to and in conflict with his client's best interest" and with "impugning the integrity of opposing counsel, the judge and the judicial process." Rules of Professional Conduct…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Robertson; Concurrence · Robertson.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Matter of WestfallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- In re HowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
- People v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- People v. GoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.