Legal Opinion

In Re Howard

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 19, 1995No. 77446Published

1Opinion of the Court

912 S.W.2d 61 (1995)

In re Raymond HOWARD, Respondent.

No. 77446.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

December 19, 1995.

John E. Howe, Chief Disciplinary Counsel, Barry J. Klinckhardt, Asst. Disciplinary Counsel, Jefferson City, for informant.

Raymond Howard, pro se.

ORIGINAL DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

BENTON, Judge.

The Chief Disciplinary Counsel charges attorney Raymond Howard with "placing his own prurient interests paramount to and in conflict with his client's best interest" and with "impugning the integrity of opposing counsel, the judge and the judicial process." Rules of Professional Conduct…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Robertson; Concurrence · Robertson.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Matter of WestfallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. In re HowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  4. People v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. People v. GoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API