Legal Opinion

Teas v. Ferguson

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided March 19, 2009No. Civil 07-5146PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JIMM LARRY HENDREN, District Judge.

Now on this 19th day of March, 2009, comes on for consideration the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 62) herein and the Plaintiffs’ Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 63). The Court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds and orders as follows with respect thereto:

1. In his Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommended denying in part, and granting in part, the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 42). Specifically, the Magistrate Judge…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gipp v. WebbDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2024
  2. Morgan v. HinelyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API