Arant v. Stover
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs move to remand this case to the Court of Common Pleas for Lancaster County, South Carolina, from whence it came by removal procedure. Decision pivots on plaintiffs’ claim that complete diversity 1 does not exist because plaintiff Tom Drake and defendant T. M. Stover are residents of Alabama. Admittedly, neither Tom Drake, nor anyone in whom he, at the time, had an interest or kinship, was involved in the accident 2 of January 12, 1965. At some later date Arant assigned an Idooth interest to Drake, who, as an Alabama resident, defeats diversity…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mecom v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- McSparran v. WeistCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- James L. Lester, Administrator of the Estate of Flossie Mae Garner Brown, Deceased v. Heyward McFaddon and Cameron Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Grassi v. Ciba-Geigy, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Grassi v. Ciba-Geigy, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Picquet v. Amoco Production Co.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1981
- Long & Foster Real Estate, Inc. v. NRT Mid-Atlantic, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- Carter v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.