Legal Opinion

Harrison v. McPherson

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 28, 1915No. 147PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Petition for mandamus by James Harrison and Hettie W. Harrison against Plon. Smith McPherson, as Judge of the District Court of the United States for' the Southern District of Iowa.

1Opinion of the Court

AMIDON, District Judge.

This is another branch of the case of Harrison v. Richards, 226 Fed. 196, —— C. C. A. -, in which our opinion has just been filed. The facts are stated there, and need not be repeated.

Upon the coming down of our mandate in that case, counsel for Mr. and Mrs. Harrison applied to the District Court to file it in that court, and enter a judgment and decree therein in accordance with the mandate, dismissing the bill, and for $835.SS as costs, so that execution could be issued to enforce our judgment. The trial judge denied this application. The learned judge stated his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harrison v. RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Home Indemnity Co. of New York v. O'BRIENCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  2. Gockstetter v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API