Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2019No. 20180276PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

[¶1] Michael Keondre Smith appealed from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Smith argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel based on his trial counsel's failure to reasonably investigate prior to trial and failure to call a police officer as a witness. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). See Steinbach v. State , 2015 ND 34 , ¶ 10, 859 N.W.2d 1 ("[t]he applicant must first overcome the strong presumption counsel's representation fell within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.").

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Steinbach v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API