Legal Opinion

State v. Duncan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 2008No. 91A08PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of the Court of Appeals, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and that court is instructed to reinstate the judgment of the trial court. Discretionary review of the additional issue was improvidently allowed. Defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is dismissed without prejudice to his right to raise that issue by filing a motion for appropriate relief in the superior court.

REVERSED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crawford v. MintzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Crawford v. MintzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. PotterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. State v. CopenhaverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
  4. State v. KeatonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. State v. PotterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API