Cetofonte v. Camden Coke Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to tlie Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of: the court was delivered by
Trenchard, J.
The plaintiff’s intestate, a common laborer, was employed in the plant of the Camden Coke Company, wheeling coke. Me was an ignorant Italian, nineteen years of age, and had but little understanding of the English language.
The coke plant was a large one. Several tracks formed of steel rails extended between the place where decedent and other employes worked and the place where the drinking water for the men was kept. Some of these rails were heavily charged with electricity for the purpose of operating a device known as a "pusher.” Some of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dennick v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. FajardoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Mulhall v. FallonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Baxter v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Deni v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Derinza's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Meehan v. Central Railroad Company of New JerseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Prudential Insurance Co. v. LavalNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
- Torres v. SierraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- Kern v. KoganNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.