Legal Opinion

Eaton v. Truesdail

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1879No. Calendar No. 4066Published

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

The defendant Wesley Truesdail appeals from a decree declaring certain grants made at his instance to Eaton to be mortgages, and also finding to be due- and unpaid thereon a large amount and ordering foreclosure. ...

*9The grants are absolute on their face, but Truesdail holds a defeasance made by Baton and which professes to explain the nature of the claims to be secured. The instrument is, however, not free from ambiguity in this respect.

When the arrangement arose in 1857 Eaton held admitted cash demands against Truesdail amounting to $24,000, and it was expected by the parties that further…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kinsman v. ParkhurstSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. Utica Insurance v. LynchNew York Court of Chancery · 1848
  3. Popple v. DayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  4. Thorne v. HillikerMichigan Supreme Court · 1864

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API