Legal Opinion

Foster v. Municipal Housing Authority

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCharles M. Hughes, J.

The petitioner, Thurston Foster, has commenced this proceeding- under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to compel the Municipal Housing Authority of the City of Schenectady to reinstate him to the position of senior maintenance man. This position was classified as noncompetitive by the Schenectady County Civil Service Commission.

The facts, briefly stated, are as follows: The petitioner is approximately 60 years of age and has been employed by the Municipality of the City of Schenectady and the Municipal Housing Authority of the City of Schenectady as well as the Urban Redevelopment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of O'Connell v. KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. O'Connell v. KernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Everson v. ToiaNew York Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API