Legal Opinion

Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 16, 1987No. 22683PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finney, Justice:

These are medical malpractice actions. Appellants appeal from an order of the trial court granting the respondent’s (doctor) motions for summary judgment. We affirm.

Appellants commenced this action by filing a Summons and Complaint on March 8,1985. The appellant Johnnie Mae Smith (mother) sought recovery for damages sustained as a result of the doctor’s alleged negligent treatment during her pregnancy. Appellant Douglas L. Smith (father), as administrator of the child’s estate, sought recovery for the wrongful death of their child. Each lawsuit contained two causes of action,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WagnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Sellers v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Snell v. Columbia Gun Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  4. Gary Concrete Products, Inc. v. RileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Roberts v. Durham County Hospital Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Burgess v. American Cancer Society, South Carolina Division, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  2. Garner Ex Rel. Estate of Garner v. HouckSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Samson v. Greenville Hospital SystemSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  4. Hoffman Ex Rel. Estate of Hoffman v. PowellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Jenkins v. MearesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API