Legal Opinion
DiRussa v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 29, 1996No. 95 Civ. 4469 (CSH)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HAIGHT, Senior District Judge:
These are cross-motions to vacate and confirm an award of arbitrators. The factual background appears in the Court’s Memorandum and Order dated October 20, 1995, familiarity with which is presumed.
I
In their initial cross-motion, defendants moved to dismiss plaintiffs complaint, as well as confirm the award. The ground for the motion to dismiss was an asserted lack of subject matter jurisdiction in this Court. On the pleadings as they then existed, that question turned upon whether plaintiffs arbitra-ble claims sufficiently implicated the Age…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Jack BobkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Whittlesey v. Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Hagelthorn v. Kennecott Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- DiRussa v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Chisolm v. Kidder, Peabody Asset Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Commercial Union Insurance v. LinesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002