Lampman v. Bruning
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Carroll District Court. — HoN. Z. A. Church, Judge. ActioN for seduction. Verdict against defendant, upon which judgment was entered, and he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
The petition alleges that plaintiff was, “on or about the 20th day of January, A. D. 1898, an unmarried woman of chaste character; * * * that on or about said 20th day of January, 1898, the said defendant, with artifice, persuasion, and entreaties, and under promise of marriage, did seduce, debauch, and carnally know the-plaintiff, and as a result of sexual intercourse the plaintiff was, on or about the 29th day of September, A. D. 1898, delivered of a.female child.”
*169Under t'hese allegations the question of her previous chastity was submitted to the jury, and, upon an affirmative finding, loss…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Murray v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Cotes v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
- Moffatt v. . FultonNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Flanagan v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- Peet v. PeetSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wilson v. CorbinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Lawson v. FordyceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Sachra v. Town of ManillaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Reutkemeier v. NolteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Ege v. BornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.