Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Blaxton v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 21, 2016No. SC15-1307Published

1ConcurrencePariente, J.

I concur with the Court’s decision to prevent Blaxton from filing any further pleadings unless those pleadings are filed in good faith through an attorney. Majority op. at 5-6. As the opinion makes clear, the sheer volume of Blaxton’s pro se filings warrants us taking this step. In his latest petition for mandamus, he requested that this Court “compel the State to convene a grand jury to review his incarceration,” a request that does “not satisfy the basic requirements for the issuance of a writ of mandamus.” See majority op. at 4.

I write, however, to highlight a potential legal problem with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bloodworth v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. Blaxton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. Lamore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. Blaxton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API