Legal Opinion
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Boyce Motor Lines, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 10, 1947PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
On August 8, 1947, the plaintiff filed a complaint in the District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that the plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of New Jersey, duly authorized to do business in the State of New York; that the defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of New York and is engaged in the business of common carrier by motor vehicle in interstate commerce between certain points and places including the cities of Rochester, N. Y., and New York, N. Y.; and that the defendant is duly…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Mississippi Publishing Corp. v. MurphreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- In Re HohorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jerry Wayne Davis v. Hill Engineering, Inc. And Williams-Mcwilliams Co., Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Jacobson v. Indianapolis Power & Light CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1958
- Hintz v. Austenal Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1952
- International Harvester Company v. FarisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Jerry Wayne Davis v. Hill Engineering, Inc. And Williams-Mcwilliams Co., Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.