Legal Opinion

Corey v. City of Fort Dodge

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 19, 1902PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Webster District Court. — Hon. J. R. Whitaker, Judge. Action in equity to restrain the defendant city from opening and improving a street upon land claimed by the plaintiff. The relief asked was denied by the district eourt, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

The plaintiff is owner of a tract of land in the Northwest corner of block seventeen in Morrison & Duncombe’s addition to the city of Ft. Dodge, and the litigation in this case arises over the location of the boundary between said block and the adjacent street on the north, known as “Second Avenue South” or “Walnut Street.” The Morrison & Duncombe addition was platted in the year 1856. ' It embraced an eighty-acre tract according to government survey, and was supposed to measure 2,640 feet in length, north and south. If, however, we turn to the plat as recorded, and aggregate the mea'sures of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller v. Mills CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  2. Simplot v. City of DubuqueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  3. Incorporated Town of Cambridge v. CookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  4. Smith v. City of OsageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  5. Smith v. GorrellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  2. Quinn v. BaageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Burroughs v. City of CherokeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Sachs v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Halverson v. Village of DeerwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API