Legal Opinion

Ciulla v. Lavine

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1974Published

1Opinion of the CourtJames H. Boomer, J.

Petitioners, recipients of public assistance, bring this article 78 proceeding to review the determina*298tion of the Commissioner of Social Services in fixing the schedule of heating allowances.

Respondent, prior to answer, has made objections in point of law. The first objection is that the petition does not state a cause of action and must, therefore, be dismissed under CPLR 3211, subd. [a], par. 7). When an attack is made upon a pleading without the submission of evidentiary material, the pleading will be liberally construed and ‘ ‘ deemed to allege whatever can be implied from its statement…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Trustees of the Village of Saratoga Springs v. Saratoga Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Packer Collegiate Institute v. University of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Darweger v. StaatsNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Matter of Mandell v. Board of RegentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Matter of Meenagh v. DeweyNew York Court of Appeals · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API