Legal Opinion

Parry & Jones v. Empire Granite Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 6, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal in Chancery, 'Washington. .County. Heard in Chambers, August 24, 1915, on the pleadings, master’s report, and plaintiff’s exception thereto, Stanton, Chancellor. Decree overruling plaintiff’s exceptions, and dismissing the bill with costs. The plaintiff appealed. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

This is a bill in chancery to restrain defendants from collecting a judgment which the defendant bank has obtained against the plaintiffs. The original suit was here on the question of assessment of damages. See Granite Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Parry & Jones, 84 Vt. 159, 78 Atl. 789, Plaintiffs now seek to have the enforcement of the judgment therein perpetually enjoined on the grounds, (1) of newly discovered evidence; (2) of fraud and collusion between the defendants to secure said judgment; (3) for that the notes on which the judgment ivas based had been paid; (4) for that, if…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fife v. CateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1912
  2. Randall v. MoodySupreme Court of Vermont · 1913
  3. Weed v. HuntSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908
  4. Granite Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Parry & JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. White River Chair Co. v. Connecticut River Power Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  2. State v. KaatzSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API