Gerstein v. Teitelbaum
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Though it is claimed that the partnership was terminable at will, plaintiff does not allege that the partnership was dissolved at his election. The bringing of an action for dissolution of a partnership and for an accounting does not constitute an election on the part of plaintiff to exercise his right to dissolve the partnership notwithstanding that he had such right to dissolve. There must be a notice of election to terminate or a mutual agreement. (Brady v. Powers, 112 App. Div. 845, 850, mod. 188 N. Y. 626; Klenoff v. Goodstein, 268 App. Div. 510, 511.)
The action brought by plaintiff is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brady v. PowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Klenoff v. GoodsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Brady v. . PowersNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
3Cited by3 opinions
- Napoli v. DomnitchNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Posner v. PosnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Jones v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1958