Legal Opinion

Nguyen v. Berryhill

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 27, 2021No. 3:18-cv-00590Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CU NGUYEN, Case No.: 18-cv-00590-H-KSC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES 14 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting [Doc. No. 37.] Commissioner of Social Security 15 Administration, 16 Defendant. 17 18 On June 8, 2021, Plaintiff Cu Nguyen filed a motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to 19 the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and Ninth Circuit Rule 39-1.6. (Doc. 20 No. 37.) On July 22, 2021, Defendant filed a response in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion 21 for attorney’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Abbott v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API