People v. Martinez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*959The County Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 200.20 (3) to sever the charges under the first and third counts of the indictment, which arose from separate incidents on separate dates. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he failed to demonstrate that there was substantially more proof of one incident, as compared to the other, and that there was a substantial likelihood that the jury would be unable to consider separately the proof as it related to each incident (see CPL 200.20 [3] [a]; People v Cox, 298 AD2d 461 [2002]).…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. MontalvoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. BertaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. HaywoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. FerminAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. BeltranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. KayeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. BeltranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.