Legal Opinion
State v. Morris
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 30, 2009No. 36923-1-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
210 P.3d 1025 (2009)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Darnell Larry MORRIS, Appellant.
No. 36923-1-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
June 30, 2009.
Kathryn A. Russell Selk, Russell Selk Law Office, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Melody M. Crick, Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.
QUINN-BRINTNALL, J.
¶ 1 On March 30, 2007, Macy's loss prevention officers, via closed circuit camera, saw Darnell Morris take two watches valued at $205.02 from a clearance display at the Tacoma Mall Macy's and leave without paying for them. Because Macy's had revoked Morris's right…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. BrettWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. WarrenWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. WarrenWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. VargaWashington Supreme Court · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. SellsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State v. FedorukCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. King.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016