Legal Opinion

Gaydeski v. Ohio Liquor Control Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 2003No. 03AP-329 (REGULAR CALENDAR)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Klatt, Judge.

{¶ 1} Appellant, Lawrence E. Gaydeski, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas affirming a decision of appellee, Liquor Control Commission (“commission”), revoking appellant’s liquor licenses. Because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in affirming the commission’s decision, we affirm that judgment.

{¶ 2} Appellant operates the “Shamrock” bar in Toledo, Ohio, and holds multiple liquor licenses. On August 27, 2002, the commission mailed appellant two notices of hearing. Those notices arose from two separate incidents at Shamrock. In the first…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Our Place, Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. University Hospital v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Board of Education v. State Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. 1st Step Driving School v. Ohio Department of Public Safety, Division of Administration, Governor's Highway Safety OfficeShelby County Court of Common Pleas · 2007
  2. State v. WashingtonOhio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API