Legal Opinion
Gittings v. Von Dorn
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 6, 1920PublishedCited by 35 opinions
Ap-peal from the Court of Common Pleas of Baltimore City (Stanton, J.).
1Opinion of the CourtPattison, J.
This is an action for deceit, brought by the appelleesi against the appellant to recover damages said to have been sustained by them because of certain alleged misrepresentations made to them by the appellant.
The declaration consists of four counts,. In the first it is ■alleged, that:
“In September, 1913, the appellee, Theodore F. Von Dorn entered into a contract or an agreement with one Eoseoe Crary, ‘both individually and as president of the Dare Lumber Company, a body corporate, duly incorporated under the laws of the State of New York, whereby the said plaintiff agreed to seek a purchaser…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McAleer v. HorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
- Robertson v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
- Boulden v. StilwellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
- Buschman v. CoddCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
- Cahill v. ApplegarthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
3Cited by35 opinions
- Martens Chevrolet, Inc. v. SeneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Alleco Inc. v. Harry & Jeanette Weinberg Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Gross v. Sussex Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Ellerin v. Fairfax SavingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Parker v. Columbia BankCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.