Legal Opinion

Commercial Bank of Magee v. Evans

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1927No. 26315PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtANdersoN, J.

The first suit was not brought under the statute. If it was intended to be.brought under the statute, there was a failure to comply with the statute. Appellees were not parties to it, and are not bound by the judgment rendered therein.

The statute wrote into Owen’s bond the condition it required to be in there. The statute is mandatory. The obligor and the obligee, as well as the sureties on the bond, are presumed to have known what the statute requires when the bond was executed. The bond having been executed, and having accomplished its purpose, the law will write into the bond what it…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Camdenton Consolidated School District No. 6 Ex Rel. W. H. Powell Lumber Co. v. New York Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  2. EUCLID-MISS., a DIV. OF TRIPPEER ORGANIZATIONS v. Western Cas. & Sur. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State ex rel. National Surety Corp. v. MalvaneyMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Union Indemnity Co. v. Acme Blow Pipe & Sheet Metal WorksMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Watts v. Western Cas. & Surety Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API