Legal Opinion

In re Carney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the petitioner, James Carney, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Albany Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Rensselaer on the 29th day of February, 1916, denying his motion for an accounting, and also from a second order entered in said clerk’s office on the same day denying his motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Kellogg, P. J.:

The appellant petitioned the court that his attorney be compelled to render an accounting for the moneys received by him as such attorney. In his petition he states that he had agreed with his attorney to pay him fifty per cent of the amount realized from the matter for his services and disbursements, but alleges that he was overreached in the matter, and the attorney did not give him full information, and that the services rendered by the attorney were of the value of only $1,000, whereas it appears that the half of the amount realized was greatly in excess of that sum, which…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re PrattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  2. Taraborrelli v. VinciguerraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API