Matter of Will of Worrell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
APPEAL FROM 10 JANUARY 1977 JUDGMENT
Propounders contend first that the trial court erred in refusing to permit them, during the voir dire examination of prospective jurors, to inquire if they believed in the right of a person to make a will. We think this contention has merit.
G.S. 9-15(a) specifically provides that any party to an action, or his counsel of record, “shall be allowed, in selecting the jury, to make direct oral inquiry of any prospective juror as to the fitness and competency of any person to serve as a juror ...”
The voir dire examination of prospective jurors…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bost v. . BostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. CareySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- In Re Will of RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- In Re HintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Hill v. CoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- In re the Purported Last Will & Testament of BethuneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983