Legal Opinion
Pates & Allen Co. v. Bank of Norris
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided January 7, 1918No. 9846PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Before Moore, J., Pickens, Fall term, 1916. From taxation of costs, defendant appeals. cite: 41 S. C. 208; 79 S. C. 388; 22 S. C. 313; 104 S. C. 391; 93 S. C. 317. No copy of argument furnished Reporter.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. ChiEE Justice Gary.
This is an appeal from the taxation of costs.
There was a former appeal in this case, and the judgment of the Supreme Court was as follows:
“It is the judgment of this Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court be modified in the particular hereinbefore mentioned, and that in all other respects it be affirmed.”
The first appeal herein arose out of an order made by his Honor, the Circuit Judge, at chambers, in which he ruled that under a decree theretofore rendered the Bank of Norris was entitled to the mule in dispute or $200…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Galloway v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
- Brown & Parker v. KolbSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
- Burnett Johnson v. SennSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
- Spence v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
- Pates & Allen Co. v. BowenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
3Cited by1 opinion
- Franks v. RossSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920