Legal Opinion

Hylton v. Vaught

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 28, 1989No. WD 41649PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs Duane and Carol Jean Hylton appeal an order granting a new trial in favor of defendant Jack Vaught. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiffs Duane and Carol Hylton filed an action for damages alleging that defendant Jack Vaught improperly installed a roof on their residence. After trial on October 25, 1988, the court entered judgment for the plaintiffs in the amount of $6,310. Sustaining the defendant’s post-trial motion on January 24, 1989, the court set aside the judgment and ordered a new trial. The court’s order, however, failed to specify any ground for granting a new trial.

After…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Quinn v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. Norman v. LandingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Havrilla v. Millers Mutual Insurance Ass'n of IllinoisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blue Cross Health Services, Inc. v. SauerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Rodman v. SchrimpfMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Stewart v. StewartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API