Legal Opinion

Hendley v. South Carolina State Budget & Control Board ex rel. Division of Insurance Services

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 4, 1999No. 24875Published

1Opinion of the Court

FINNEY, Chief Justice:

We granted certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals which held that the State Health Plan (Plan) is obligated to pay for a “cranial hair vacuum prosthesis” for respondent Janet Hendley, who suffers from a medical condition which causes the loss of all body hair.1 Hendley v. South Carolina State Budget and Control Board, 325 S.C. 413, 481 S.E.2d 159 (Ct.App.1996). We reverse, finding substantial evidence in the record supports the petitioner’s decision to deny coverage for this prosthetic device.

In this appeal brought pursuant to the Administrative…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sierra Club v. Kiawah Resort AssociatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  2. Hendley v. South Carolina State Budget & Control BoardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API