Legal Opinion

Shipman v. Coryell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Case made from Bay. (Maxwell, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants assign error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The defendants appealed from a verdict and judgment rendered against them by direction of the circuit court. '

Plaintiff’s action is based upon an admitted claim of $561, and the only question in the case relates to a claim of set-off arising upon a previous transaction. In June and July, 1893, the defendants received a large quantity of coal, previously ordered from the plaintiff, which, they allege, was to have been chestnut coal, egg coal, and stove coal. On July 24 and August 28, respectively, the defendants gave their notes, aggregating $6,134, being the full price of this coal. These…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Webber v. HoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Petersen v. Door, Sash & Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Gutta Percha & Rubber Manufacturing Co. v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Chicago Rubber Clothing Co. v. PowersMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. SeaverMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wyckoff, Seamans & Benedict v. BishopMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API