Building Services Unlimited Inc. v. Riley
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
In my memorandum opinion of September 20, 2002, I directed plaintiff, Maxine Mount (“Mount”), to provide “specific documentary evidence in the form of a can-celled check, receipt, or other document that shows that Mrs. Riley’s accounting or any entry in it is wrong.” Id. at 9.
In response, Mount concedes that Mrs. Riley’s arithmetic is correct, but raises for the first time in this litigation, which is heading into its ninth year, a new issue. Mount says:
The Riley tax treatment for the ownership of the condo cannot be used to calculate…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gray v. GrayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Hosford v. Estate of CampbellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989