Legal Opinion

Building Services Unlimited Inc. v. Riley

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 18, 2002No. Civil Action No. 94cv1680 (JMF)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.

In my memorandum opinion of September 20, 2002, I directed plaintiff, Maxine Mount (“Mount”), to provide “specific documentary evidence in the form of a can-celled check, receipt, or other document that shows that Mrs. Riley’s accounting or any entry in it is wrong.” Id. at 9.

In response, Mount concedes that Mrs. Riley’s arithmetic is correct, but raises for the first time in this litigation, which is heading into its ninth year, a new issue. Mount says:

The Riley tax treatment for the ownership of the condo cannot be used to calculate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gray v. GrayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Hosford v. Estate of CampbellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API