Legal Opinion

Hunter v. . Gerson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1919Published

Civil ACTION, tried at February Term, 1919, of Meoelenbueg, upon certain issues submitted to tbe jury. From tbe judgment favoring tbe plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBkowN, J.

Tbis action is brought to recover damages for a breach of contract in tbe sale of tbe rails and fastenings of tbe Eddie Lake & Northern Eailway Company, as tbe same lay on the railroad bed. Fifteen issues were submitted to tbe jury, which it is not necessary to set out. Tbe jury found tbat tbe contract was duly entered into by tbe defendant, and tbat tbe defendant wrongfully failed and refused to comply with tbe contract, and wrongfully refused to permit tbe plaintiff to take up and remove tbe rail and fastenings. Tbe jury assessed tbe damages in favor of tbe plaintiff. According to tbe…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Lumber Co. v. Quiett Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Berbarry v. . TombacherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. American Lumber Co. v. Drexel Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API