Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Mott
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 31, 1975No. Appeal, 471PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Per Curiam,
The six Judges who heard this appeal being equally divided the judgment of sentence is affirmed.
Opinion by
Van der Voort, J.,
in Support of Af-firmance:
Appeal is taken to this Court from conviction by jury and sentence by the trial court on charges of criminal conspiracy, criminal solicitation and bribery in official matters, these offenses being violations of the Crimes Code, sections 903, 902 and 4701, respectively. The conspiracy, solicitation and bribery related to a charge of conducting a lottery. Appellant’s motions in arrest of judgment and for new trial were denied. We…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Leonard Watson A/K/A 'Step'Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Frederick W. Klosterman. United States v. John R. Deeney, Jr. United States v. Joseph A. StaffordCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Commonwealth v. ConwaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Commonwealth v. KleinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ManleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. ClawsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- State v. GumiennyHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.