Legal Opinion

Antero & Lost Park Reservoir Co. v. Lowe

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 5, 1921No. 9360; No. 9363PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion to re-tax costs. Items re-taxed.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

The suit was brought in the district court of Adams *468county by Lowe, et al., taxpayers of the Denver Municipal Irrigation District against the Antero Land Company, et al., on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, to enforce specific performance of a contract between the Irrigation District and Fred L. Lucas. The principal defendants were The Antero and Lost Park Reservoir Company and Lucas. Pierce, et al., intervened on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, claiming an interest in the subject of the litigation. The claims of the intervenors were allowed, and those…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Phillips v. CorbinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Glavino v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  2. Davies v. CraigSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  3. Wallace Plumbing Co. v. DillonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  4. Webber v. PhisterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API