Legal Opinion

Rothstein v. Mirvis & Fox, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 26, 1980No. 59720PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Judge.

Suit on open account. Mirvis & Fox, appellee herein, is a textile company selling a varity of items. The appellant, Herman Rothstein, purchased numerous items such as bedspreads, potholders, towel ends, tank sets, bath sets, rugs, wash cloths, chair and sofa throws, and the like during 1975 and 1976. The evidence offered by the vice-president of Mirvis & Fox, Saul Fox, established that Rothstein came to the appellee’s place of business and purchased items directly from the warehouse, accepted immediate delivery and usually drove away with the purchased items. Purchase order…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Melton v. BowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Gage v. Tiffin Motor Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Drillers Service, Inc. v. MoodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  4. Hurt & Quinn, Inc. v. KeenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  5. Roberts v. Tomlinson, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1979

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bellsouth Advertising & Publishing Corp. v. McCollumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  2. Kemira, Inc. v. Williams Investigative & Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Kroger Co. v. U. S. Foodservice of Atlanta, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. Professional Insurance Services, Inc. v. Sizemore Electric Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  5. Cox v. Farmers BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API